Category Archives: Bio Climatic Architecture

Skyscrapers

Cities are becoming bigger and bigger, more people is moving to urban areas and high density seems to be the answer to all city problems.

I have already posted about density several times but I think skyscrapers need their own space and I have found that Boeri Studio has built this tower in Milan.

Bosco Verticale. Image from stefanoboeriarchitetti.net.
Bosco Verticale. Image from stefanoboeriarchitetti.net.

The two residential towers show a kind of vertical forest or ‘bosco verticale’ as Boeri refers to the project as a dense solution to an increasing population.

The problems of high rise buildings are several. On one hand they need a lot of energy to operate. Lifts, mechanical ventilation and more complex systems consume resources and energy in greater rates than less dense solutions. Their shape generates problems of shadow in a street level and requires expensive and complex structural solutions.

They also could produce mobility and transportation problems, among others, in the city as they increase the population in a single spot. Also when an unexpected situation arises, as a fire or black out, the ways to resolve it and/or evacuate the residents are costly and complex.

Building without Heating-Austria

House without Heating. be baumschlager eberle. From detail-online.com
House without Heating. be baumschlager eberle. From detail-online.com

This office building designed and built in Austria has not heating.

The weather in Austria is not really temperate but passive solar design and thermal mass can produce good sustainable architecture. Good sustainable architecture as our ancestors produced around the world and known as Traditional Architecture or Vernacular Architecture.

Nowadays, in part caused by a misunderstanding of the Modernist Movement, architecture schools, offices and professionals do not know much about traditional solutions and they keep copying a 100 years old style without attention to the site or the local culture.

Fortunately this is changing slowly.

Green Star

For some time now I have been reading and listening different complains about rating tools. Some say that their point system is influenced by different lobbies (a kind legal corruption?) and some scholars argue that they have a big deficiency in assessing passive design and other problems.

I believe that they have been a good first step, a tool that general people can use and apply but, now that I am dealing at work with the process of Green Star, I really think that it has become a huge business. I do not remember the actual data but just to register a building to be assessed you have to pay tens of thousands of dollar. That is insane.

Also, the majority of the systems assessed are related to energy consumption (nothing new), so to achieve a good rating it is necessary to work hard with the engineers and convince them that a passive solution is a good solution and that, for instance, it can reduce the amount of HVAC needed.

I think that working side by side with all the consultants is a really good thing, but I am really disappointed for Green Star after dealing with it.

Globalized Architecture

One of the biggest problems in the built environment is that schools do not teach passive design, build for the place, local strategies, materials and techniques.

After the WWII architects around the world have designed and built similar architecture for very different environments and cultures, and I think that is wrong.

I think this project is a good example of a positive solar city but still is following this new globalized architecture. Lets start building for and with the place!

Good passive design, bio-climatic architecture within a place, a culture. Lets use local materials as far as we will be able, lets build for the people that is going to live and use that spaces.

The problem is that maybe people prefer globalized architecture.